{"id":4936,"date":"2025-03-11T17:46:09","date_gmt":"2025-03-11T17:46:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thataintnoplane.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/11\/new-lue-letter-to-congress-show-bigelow-uap-facility-approximate-location-3\/"},"modified":"2025-03-11T17:46:09","modified_gmt":"2025-03-11T17:46:09","slug":"new-lue-letter-to-congress-show-bigelow-uap-facility-approximate-location-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thataintnoplane.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/11\/new-lue-letter-to-congress-show-bigelow-uap-facility-approximate-location-3\/","title":{"rendered":"New Lue Letter to congress show Bigelow UAP Facility Approximate Location"},"content":{"rendered":"

New Lue Letter to Congress Reveals Approximate Location of Bigelow UAP Facility<\/strong><\/p>\n

A new development has emerged as Dean Johnson shares four letters sent by Representatives Burlison and Nancy Mace to Lue, Tim, Gold, and Shellenberger following the November 2024 hearing. These letters include a series of questions that require responses in written form. The most noteworthy letter comes from Lue, which introduces new insights related to eleven specific questions.<\/p>\n

Lue’s Letter:<\/strong> View here<\/a><\/p>\n

While you can read the complete letters, the key highlights include the government\u2019s discovery of new physics through the study of UAPs, which are now being utilized in defense projects. Lockheed intended to dispose of UAP materials, likely due to the inability to uncover further insights and budget constraints following 9\/11. Representative Steny Hoyer requested $10 million for Bigelow Aerospace to construct a facility at Patuxent River Naval Air Station dedicated to housing UAPs. Lue visited the hangar during its construction, but the CIA and Air Force later blocked the transfer. This facility is categorized as SAP-F, indicating compliance with Special Access Program requirements.<\/p>\n

Although the exact hangar location remains undisclosed, you can check the approximate area here: Location<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Additionally, a “UAP Security Classification Guide” exists, detailing classified elements associated with UAPs and their respective classification levels. There is also a document outlining “UAP Collection Requirements” available through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.<\/p>\n

In 2004, a week-long government conference was held to debate the potential disclosure of UAP information, ultimately concluding that such disclosure should not occur. Notably, this conference was sponsored by the White House<\/strong>!<\/p>\n

This information raises interesting questions, particularly regarding former President Bush\u2019s awareness of the UAP issue. Whistleblowers like Bill Uhouse indicated that their NDAs ended in 2003, suggesting the government may have planned for disclosure in 2004, possibly even preparing NDAs with that timeline in mind.<\/p>\n

In this video, Puthoff discusses events from that conference, revealing financial motivations as companies threatened lawsuits against the government for granting preferential treatment to certain firms, such as Lockheed: Watch here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Links to PDF Letters:<\/strong><\/p>\n