DOPSR wouldn\u2019t approve statements based on the premise that \u201cnot doing so would imply they’re true.\u201d<\/p>\n
Everything that Grusch or Elizondo had cleared through DOPSR consists of information the government found acceptable for public disclosure, either because they believe it’s not true or it doesn’t involve classified or sensitive details.<\/p>\n
They don’t engage in any sort of double bluff.<\/p>\n
If any of the information Grusch submitted to DOPSR were true or sensitive\u2014like claims about alien crash retrievals\u2014they would have simply marked it as “classified.” Moreover, he wouldn’t be allowed to disclose anything that was deemed off-limits.<\/p>\n
You can’t approach DOPSR with a statement like, “I want to say we have alien spacecraft at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base,” and expect them to simply respond, “No, that’s classified.” Then turn around and claim that DOPSR’s refusal means there must be truth to your assertion. Doing so would still mean you are expressing the very claim they prohibited.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s no catch-22 here. Grusch and Elizondo presented their claims to DOPSR, which read through them and said, “Sure, you can say that if you want,” because the information isn’t sensitive, likely because it lacks any factual basis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"