Ross is diving deep into the “woo” territory, and I couldn’t help but share this clip that popped up on my timeline:<\/p>\n
[Link to tweet]<\/p>\n
I used to think of Ross as a fairly level-headed journalist, someone who approached claims with healthy skepticism and demanded proof. Even when he was vague about giant UFOs buried underground or mentioned an orb he reported on without giving any updates, I still saw him as more focused on tangible evidence than the mystical side of things.<\/p>\n
However, the clip above raises concerns for me about Ross’s objectivity and whether he\u2019s becoming too aligned with unproven concepts. <\/p>\n
I personally believe in some of the “woo” elements and think many will eventually be validated\u2014it just requires time and solid evidence. Actual demonstrations would be incredibly helpful.<\/p>\n
While Ross sharing that the phenomenon is guiding him and manifesting through his daughter is intriguing, it feels more like a captivating narrative without proof to back it up. <\/p>\n
If NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) prefers to communicate solely with those who have psychic abilities, it raises questions about accessibility and could even stifle critical inquiry.<\/p>\n
By claiming that NHI is influencing his journalism, Ross might inadvertently dismiss the need for evidence from skeptics. <\/p>\n
It’s pretty disheartening. Independent voices advocating for proof of extraordinary claims are increasingly rare, and perhaps I placed too much faith in Ross\u2019s professionalism.<\/p>\n
At this stage, he seems more akin to Chris Bledsoe than a straightforward journalist. I hope Ross eventually reveals the location of this alleged massive UFO, but right now, he often sounds like someone insisting, “You don\u2019t have to believe it; it\u2019s true anyway.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"