There’s been considerable buzz surrounding Luna’s recent announcement about an upcoming revelation that will “impact the entire nation,” and it’s baffling to see people speculating about unrelated topics, such as “It’s about Elvis” or “just a partisan stunt like putting Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.”<\/p>\n
This post aims to clarify why the only relevant topic here is UAPs\/NHI:<\/p>\n
Context:<\/strong><\/p>\n Moskowitz’s Response:<\/strong> Luna’s Statement: “Bigger than aliens.”<\/strong> Some argue it might relate to a political issue she considers “bigger,” but overlooking the broader context is essential. The parameters set by Moskowitz suggest this must be tied to UAPs. He wouldn’t assert knowledge about a non-related topic.<\/p>\n Luna’s Claim: “The government has been lying to us.”<\/strong> Impact on the Nation:<\/strong> Jared: “Warmish” Response on Disclosure:<\/strong> Seriously? How could anyone believe this isn\u2019t about UAPs or disclosure? What counterarguments exist for those still holding onto other theories?<\/p>\n Will It Live Up to the Hype?<\/strong> That said, Moskowitz\u2019s hints and comments imply that what\u2019s forthcoming is meaningful and could potentially influence public perception. While it might reinforce believers, it could also be something less impactful, like introducing a new whistleblower or providing additional evidence.<\/p>\n In summary, I recommend tempered enthusiasm; while the announcement will likely pertain to UAPs or disclosure, expecting it to trigger automatic revelations may be unrealistic. Ignoring the context just doesn\u2019t hold up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\nMoskowitz commented “I know” on Luna’s announcement on Twitter. Their collaboration has only one context\u2014UAPs. His evident passion for the subject suggests he wouldn’t engage with her post if it weren’t related to that. This alone indicates the announcement’s focus.<\/p>\n
\nWhen Luna mentions something “bigger than aliens,” it can only imply significant revelations about either 1. crash retrieval programs or 2. the U.S. government’s long history of knowledge about extraterrestrial visits over the past 80 years.<\/p>\n
\nThis aligns perfectly with the earlier statements, further reducing the likelihood of an alternative interpretation. If something is hidden regarding UAPs, it underscores the need for transparency and truthfulness.<\/p>\n
\nCritics have said, “If it were about aliens, it would impact the world.” However, as a MAGA supporter, Luna likely views the impact primarily on the U.S. population, emphasizing how the government’s deception has affected its citizens. She may be prioritizing national interest in her announcement, possibly even envisioning significant political gains from it.<\/p>\n
\nDespite these arguments, I’ve been downvoted, and Moskowitz described his feelings as “warmish” when asked if the announcement pertains to disclosure.
\nLink to the Article<\/a><\/p>\n
\nI\u2019m generally optimistic, but I have reservations about whether Luna and James Comer can deliver the big announcement that will sway skeptics. Nonetheless, I commend their commitment to uncovering the truth.<\/p>\n