Claims made without evidence are essentially just entertainment. Can we all agree on that?<\/p>\n
I’ve been attempting to log and track the various claims being made on my site, but I’ve encountered a significant challenge\u2014there’s no effective way to monitor them.<\/p>\n
Most claims cannot be resolved without full disclosure, rendering them largely meaningless. Many are vague or open-ended and can easily be altered if deadlines pass. Some claims are said to have evidence that hasn’t been presented, or the evidence simply hasn’t been collected for various reasons. What results is a cycle of arguments between prominent figures, such as “Aliens are dangerous!” “No, they’re not!” or debates about a potential false flag alien invasion.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s a lot of pseudo-academic discourse happening here, which is concerning. Regardless of whether you believe in this phenomenon, can we agree that most of the conversations taking place are neither genuine journalism nor academic in nature?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"