Here’s a revised version of the post:<\/p>\n
Remember Barber, the psionics expert? In 2021, Bigelow remarked, “Machinery truly exists. Its consciousness-driven, not just like fingerprints. As a species, we\u2019re embarrassingly behind\u2014still relying on fire engines. Our spiritual evolution has flatlined. Some individuals can actually perform macro psychokinesis.”<\/p>\n
Joe Murgia shared a clip from a video interview with Bigelow<\/a> on X, featuring some intriguing quotes. It\u2019s worth noting that the CIA previously blocked the transfer of NHI crafts<\/a> to Bigelow Aerospace.<\/p>\n Knapp:<\/strong> \u201cDid you ever see it?\u201d Bigelow seems visibly uneasy responding to this question. He appears to be a firsthand witness who is constrained from speaking out, leaving the possibility open for future developments.<\/p>\n Bigelow:<\/strong> \u201cI think that machinery does exist\u2014it really does. However, the challenge has been the inability to reverse engineer it. Some aspects might require a weightless environment, which we don\u2019t have on Earth. What\u2019s needed is a manufacturing facility that offers such an environment.\u201d <\/p>\n Knapp:<\/strong> \u201cThat\u2019s part of why you established Bigelow Aerospace.\u201d Bigelow:<\/strong> \u201cAs a species, we are embarrassingly behind\u2014we’re practically a galactic embarrassment. We might not even be able to consciously operate these machines because they\u2019re not like fingerprints or anything; they\u2019re driven by consciousness. It\u2019s frustrating to realize that we may have the potential to reverse engineer more, but our current understanding remains limited.\u201d <\/p>\n Bigelow:<\/strong> \u201cWhat we\u2019re experiencing is outside the realm of our current educational systems, especially in physics. We\u2019re still dealing with primitive technologies like fire engines.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Bigelow:<\/strong> \u201cOur inclination to turn technology into weapons is concerning. There\u2019s a lack of intersection between spirituality and technology. The line for spirituality has flatlined, whereas technological evolution is accelerating rapidly.\u201d <\/p>\n Bigelow:<\/strong> \u201cWhere\u2019s the harmony? I can\u2019t foresee any significant developments in spirituality in the next century or two that would align with technological progress. There\u2019s just no indication of a future integration between the two, and that worries me.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n For more detailed insights and analysis, check out the full post on X here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Is Bigelow a Witness?<\/h3>\n
\n
\nBigelow:<\/strong> \u201cUmm. Well, I\u2019ve…there\u2019s, I, umm… You know, do you see things that are photos, or do you see things in person? You don\u2019t want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nBigelow\u2019s Analogy: Like Owning a Fragment of a Phone Case<\/h3>\n
\n
\nBigelow:<\/strong> \u201cExactly. But owning a tiny piece of a case that held a cell phone doesn\u2019t help you understand what it contained, let alone how a cell phone functions. It\u2019s all interconnected\u2014without the necessary communication infrastructure, it\u2019s useless. An answer based on just a small fragment doesn\u2019t offer much insight.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Machinery is Consciousness-Driven<\/h3>\n
\n
Humans Are Flatlined in Spiritual Evolution<\/h3>\n
\n