Does the upheaval following Disclosure have to be religious in nature? <\/p>\n
In the podcast episode with Dr. Steven Greer, he discusses a conversation he had with a JPL employee regarding obelisk-like structures on Mars that were deliberately pixellated to prevent potential religious turmoil upon their discovery. <\/p>\n
We’ve reached a crucial juncture in our history as a species, where Science has evolved from being merely a tool for explaining our experiences to a framework for determining the very reality of those experiences. If something cannot be scientifically explained, it is often dismissed as having not occurred. In contrast to the authority we’ve granted Science, Religion has never held the same unwavering power in our quest for understanding. <\/p>\n
When we observe objects in the sky that demonstrate maneuvers beyond our current understanding of Physics, or encounter beings that communicate without language and traverse vast distances at extraordinary speeds without harm, our focus should shift away from religious interpretations. Instead, we should seek scientific explanations for their baffling physiology that challenges our understanding of evolution and technologies that surpass our military defenses. In this context, the reckoning isn’t religious; it is fundamentally scientific. Ultimately, it is Science\u2014not Religion\u2014that defines our reality and asserts that what we perceive, despite our evidence, may not be real at all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"