What makes people place such importance on Tim Gallaudet\u2019s opinions? This isn\u2019t meant as a critique of him\u2014there\u2019s a lot I admire about his efforts. I\u2019m genuinely seeking to understand.<\/p>\n
Why do people give weight to his assertions? For instance, he recently suggested that UAPs and NHI might be hiding in our oceans. That\u2019s an intriguing claim, but what\u2019s the basis for it? I\u2019ve watched numerous interviews and his congressional testimony regarding UAPs, and it seems the only<\/em> insider knowledge he offers includes:<\/p>\n He once received a rogue email with a clip from either the “Go Fast” or “Gimbal” video (the details escape me). Since we\u2019ve all seen those videos now, it doesn\u2019t give him any unique insight that I don\u2019t also possess.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n He recounts a story about acquaintances on a submarine who detected an unidentified object on radar that approached rapidly and then vanished. However, the lack of specifics leaves this account lacking in evidence or clarity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n In contrast, Lue Elizondo and Jay Stratton have directly worked on UAP research programs, providing compelling insights (though I do wish their discussions stayed more focused on UAPs rather than veering into werewolves and psionics).<\/p>\n Then there are Ryan Graves and Dave Fravor, former Navy pilots with either personal encounters with UAPs or close connections to others who have consistently observed them. I\u2019m very eager to hear their perspectives.<\/p>\n So, what exactly does Tim Gallaudet contribute, aside from being a prominent figure who supports the cause and raises its profile? Am I missing something essential about him? Has he shared any new information, or is he simply reiterating what\u2019s already been said?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n