Let\u2019s discuss Richard Banduric. <\/p>\n
A few weeks ago, episode 69 of the NASA and DOD-supported Ecosystemic Futures<\/em> caught a lot of attention regarding the claims made by Richard Banduric. You can read the full transcript here<\/a>.<\/p>\n In his appearance, Banduric casually shared his experiences with classified programs focused on reverse engineering technology that “wasn’t ours.” He mentioned cloaked Black Triangles and extraterrestrial materials that can “disintegrate” and “reconfigure,” among other astonishing claims.<\/p>\n Typically, I approach whistleblower testimonies with skepticism due to the potential for red flags or ulterior motives. However, Banduric is not a whistleblower<\/strong>. He isn\u2019t connected to the UFO community and brought up these claims in a scientific context without prompting. He has experience working with DARPA and holds several patents<\/a> related to propellant-less spacecraft propulsion systems<\/a>. In his highly technical presentations<\/a> (which have surprisingly only garnered 1.5k views over four years), he even displays images of the CARET craft. Remarkably, no one in the extensive Q&A session followed up on these images.<\/p>\n It\u2019s perplexing and frustrating that, to my knowledge, no one seems to be truly attentive to Banduric\u2019s insights. We often hear from recognizable figures like Sheehan and Strieber, but there\u2019s a wealth of unexplored information here. I may not have the platform to promote this, but I\u2019m hoping the usual voices in the community can step in. There\u2019s untapped potential here. Jesse Michels, Coulthart, Dolan, UAPGerb\u2014this is a call to engage with Banduric. He stated there\u2019s information he can discuss<\/strong>, yet no one is asking the right questions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"