Increasingly skeptical: I now find that physical and\/or firsthand evidence is essential…<\/p>\n
I’ve reached a point where I no longer trust that these “whistleblowers” will significantly advance disclosure efforts. Much of the testimony is, at best, secondhand. <\/p>\n
Project Blue Beam has cast doubt on what pilots believed they witnessed near the Nimitz. I used to have the most faith in Fravor’s account, but now he\u2019s no longer a part of the equation. I\u2019m not suggesting he had any intention to deceive; it seems he was unable to clearly identify what he observed and likely wasn’t aware of any military technology that could have been involved.<\/p>\n
It could be that the government aims to cloud the truth by discrediting “whistleblowers,” or perhaps they\u2019re strategically bringing people like Lue and Grusch forward to share fragmented truths or carefully constructed misdirections.<\/p>\n
Videos and photos can be easily manipulated by amateurs. People fabricate stories for attention, the thrill of deception, their careers, or for financial gain. <\/p>\n
I still believe there\u2019s more to some of these events and reports (and far less to others), but now, concrete, irrefutable firsthand proof is crucial for any genuine progress.<\/p>\n
It feels like with every new dubious video or discrediting of “experts” and “whistleblowers,” the skepticism is only deepening. I wouldn\u2019t be surprised if this too is by design…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"